TAX FRAUD

Alfred Pettersen admits that his partnership agreement with Tarl Robinson, Plexus Worldwide was a TAX FRAUD. Please read the comments sections on the pages and posts. They contain some great info from other readers. This Blog is freedom of speech, makes no money aside from a few cents a year in affiliate linking. Reports and information contained were accurate at time of posting and nobody will correct them as they are an archived history of events. Changes may have been made, but we don't care.
Showing posts with label FDA Plexus Worldwide. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FDA Plexus Worldwide. Show all posts

Court Documents

Court Documents 

"Defendant Robinson's goal was to get full control of the company"

Here for you to view.
Not sure where they came from or who screwed who.

""22. Defendant Robinson knew that his treatment of Plaintiff at the || company's yearly convention would embarrass, humiliate and demean Plaintiff, and, in order to assure that that occurred, Robinson told many PLEXUS personnel and ambassadors that he had to send Plaintiff home due to Plaintiff's misconduct with Brittany Gaines and also due to Plaintiff being drunk. Defendant Robinson's ||"story" was communicated by Robinson to all the PLEXUS staff and, in a matter of
hours, all the PLEXUS Ambassadors (distributors).
23. As a result of Defendant Robinson's conduct and statements at the
convention in Dallas, Plaintiff sent an e-mail to Defendant Robinson, on the following Monday, saying that Plaintiff was taking a six-month sabbatical from the company. About 10 days later, Defendant Robinson had a meeting with Plaintiff, and said to Plaintiff: "Here are the terms of your sabbatical." I was thinking, you arrogant SOB. It is MY sabbatical not yours.""

Have a nice read. Here is the link: 





Health Fraud


Plexus Worldwide, the company known for a Pink Drink, has been accused of Health Fraud, violations of the FTC and the FDA,  just to name a few.

Truth in Advertising posted their independent investigation here.

I want to thank them for their hard work.

For the sceptics, naysayers and those that were just down right dirty over the years... well.. you know.





Complaints Against Plexus Worldwide

Recent Complaints Against Plexus Worldwide 

  1. False, misleading or deceptive advertising (Section 9, Food and Drugs Act)
  2. Complaint regarding the advertising of unauthorized products
  3. Prohibited advertising to the general public as treatment or cure for any Schedule A disease (Section 3, Food and Drugs Act) and False, misleading or deceptive advertising (Section 9, Food and Drugs Act)

Complaints source:

  1. Social Media
  2. In Person, Print, Website

Source: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/advert-publicit/complaint-plaintes/index-eng.php



Found by A Woman Scammed:

Randolph Road resident reported to Deputy Mark Allen someone tried to make an unauthorized purchase on her American Express card.
According to the report, American Express called the resident in regard to a purchase that was charged to her card, but was delivered to another address.
The resident stated the purchase was made with Plexus Worldwide but was declined by American Express due to different addresses for the mailing and billing addresses.
According to the report, the resident has since cancelled and shredded the card.

Source: http://www.panolian.com/2016/08/05/sheriffs-report-tragedy-claims-man-at-cypress-point/

Plexus Mega X

Plexus Worldwide released another new product at their convention in Arizona. "Plexus Mega X"

This products main ingredient ""Ahiflower oil, has never been consumed by humans before""   that is until mid 2014 when Researchers at the University of Moncton got to perform some clicinal trials.

This new product, Plexus Mega X is going to be plastered all over social media in the next few weeks to come. The company will declare that their sales have sky-rocketed and try to deceive people into thinking they are the company to be with! NOT.



‪#‎oneplexus‬ showed their new product, Mega X. New products mean that companies are phasing out non-selling products and hope that the pink drink sheep will get back on board and bust open their wallets to try this. As we know, Alfred is suing Tarl, so I guess Plexus may be facing financial difficulties. Please don't go buy this sh*t ..

Human trials of this product took place in PEI Canada in mid 2014, so this product and the long term effects aren't known, good or bad. There are several reports and documents talking about this.


Breast Health

Breast Health by Plexus Worldwide

Healthy breasts and general overall health is not something that should be taken lightly.

I'm in a playful mood today and wanted to share the label of the 'Original' Breast Cream, that Plexus Pink sold to distributors.

As with all Plexus products, please be aware, Plexus Worldwide is constantly changing products, product ingredients, and product names.

At least we know they have, or at least had, their heart in it.


I think it would be safe to assume that Dr. Spencer and Plexus lost that loving feeling after their out of court settlement.


Shut down


Tarl Robinson, "Hopes you can still be friends" after has your business shut down!

That's right, shut down.

If you thought that you were in charge of your own business, that you owned and/or operated your own Plexus business, that you had any control over your business, you were duped!

Those high up on the food chain want you to think that, the company wants you to think that,
but it's wrong.
They know that, and they know that you don't know that.

One cannot be in business for oneself if they have no control over incoming sales.

Don't bother calling, it goes to an automated voice message!

Don't call Sonya Dudley either to ask her how this is effecting her business, she will just hang up on you, or well, maybe it's just me that she will hang up on. Either way..

Plexus Worldwide claims to have 220,000 Ambassadors
All screwed.

Ah well, Ambassadors aren't smart enough to realize the cost to them.



Sealed Document

Sealed Documents



Case Information
Case Number:CV2015-051936Judge:Anderson, Aimee
File Date:5/15/2015Location:Northeast
Case Type:Civil 
Party Information
Party NameRelationshipSexAttorney
Alfred Pettersen  Plaintiff Male Philip Nathanson 
Tarl Robinson  Defendant Male Joshua Ernst 
Plexus Holdco L L P  Defendant  Joshua Ernst 
Plexus Holdings Inc  Defendant  Joshua Ernst 
Plexus Worldwide L L P  Defendant  Joshua Ernst 
Plexus Worldwide L L C  Defendant  Joshua Ernst 
Plexus Worldwide Inc  Defendant  Joshua Ernst 
Case Documents
Filing DateDescriptionDocket DateFiling Party
2/5/2016 MTC - Motion To Compel 2/5/2016  
NOTE: Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration 
2/5/2016 MTT - Motion To Transfer 2/5/2016  
NOTE: Motion to Transfer to Commercial Court 
2/5/2016 CAN - Credit Memo Appearance Fee Paid 2/5/2016  
NOTE: Credit Memo/Appearance Fee Paid 
1/29/2016 ORD - Order 1/29/2016  
NOTE: ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. 
1/29/2016 SDD - Notice: Sealed Document 2/1/2016  
NOTE: PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 
1/7/2016 ORD - Order 1/7/2016  
NOTE: ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO SEAL PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND THE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SAME. 
1/7/2016 ORD - Order 1/8/2016  
NOTE: ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO SEAL COURT RECORDS 
1/4/2016 SDD - Notice: Sealed Document 1/5/2016  
NOTE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SEAL PLAINTIFF'S PROPOSED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND THE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SAME 
12/31/2015 SDD - Notice: Sealed Document 1/4/2016  
NOTE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE HIS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. PLAINTIFF ASKS FOR ACCELERATED CONSIDERATION OF THIS MOTION. 
12/28/2015 MOT - Motion 12/29/2015  
NOTE: TO SEAL COURT RECORDS 
10/21/2015 311 - ME: 150 Day Minute Entry 10/21/2015  
9/8/2015 WSS - Waiver Of Service Of Summons 9/8/2015  
NOTE: Waiver of Service of Summons ALL DEFENDANTS 
8/19/2015 322 - ME: Notice Of Intent To Dismiss 8/19/2015  
5/15/2015 COM - Complaint 5/19/2015  
5/15/2015 CCN - Cert Arbitration - Not Subject 5/19/2015  
5/15/2015 CSH - Coversheet 5/19/2015  

TruVision Health


TruVision Health LLC 9/21/15


Department of Health and Human Services logoDepartment of Health and Human Services

Food and Drug Administration
5100 Paint Branch Parkway
College Park, MD 20740 


WARNING LETTER
SEPT 21, 2015 
VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Derek Bailey, Founding Partner
Shawn Gibson, Founding Partner
Travis Martin, Founding Partner
TruVision Health LLC
12244 S Business Park Drive
Ste. 115
Draper, UT 84020-6522 US
Re: 461315 
Dear Mr. Bailey, Mr. Gibson, Mr. Martin and:
This letter concerns your product tru Weight & EnergyTM, which is labeled and/or offered for sale as a dietary supplement. The Supplement Facts panel on your product label appears to declare AMP as a dietary ingredient. This ingredient is also called, among other names, 1,3-Dimethylbutylamine, DMBA, 2-amino-4-methylpentane, AMP citrate, and 4-methyl-2-pentanamine, and will be referred to in the rest of this letter as DMBA.  In addition, the Supplement Facts panel on your product label appears to declare Bitter Orange Extract (synephrine 30%) as a dietary ingredient. 
The term “dietary supplement” is defined in section 201(ff) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) (21 U.S.C. 321(ff)). Given that you appear to declare DMBA as a dietary ingredient in the labeling of your product, we assume you have a basis to conclude that DMBA is a “dietary ingredient” under section 201(ff)(1) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 321(ff)(1)). Assuming that DMBA is a “dietary ingredient,” it would also be a “new dietary ingredient” for which a notification is required under section 413(a)(2) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 350b(a)(2)) and 21 CFR 190.6.
Under section 413 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 350b), a dietary supplement that contains a new dietary ingredient (i.e., a dietary ingredient not marketed in the United States before October 15, 1994) shall be deemed adulterated under section 402(f) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 342(f)) unless it meets one of two requirements:
1.    The dietary supplement contains only dietary ingredients that have been present in the food supply as an article used for food in a form in which the food has not been chemically altered; or
2.    There is a history of use or other evidence of safety establishing that the dietary ingredient when used under the conditions recommended or suggested in the labeling of the dietary supplement will reasonably be expected to be safe and, at least 75 days before being introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce, the manufacturer or distributor of the dietary ingredient or dietary supplement provides FDA with information, including any citation to published articles, which is the basis on which the manufacturer or distributor has concluded that a dietary supplement containing such dietary ingredient will reasonably be expected to be safe.
DMBA
To the best of FDA’s knowledge, there is no information demonstrating that DMBA was lawfully marketed as a dietary ingredient in the United States before October 15, 1994, nor is there information demonstrating that this ingredient has been present in the food supply as an article used for human food in a form in which the food has not been chemically altered. In the absence of such information, DMBA is subject to the notification requirement in section 413(a)(2) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 350b(a)(2)) and 21 CFR 190.6. Because the required notification has not been submitted, your product is adulterated under sections 402(f)(1)(B) and 413(a) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 342(f)(1)(B) and 350b(a)).
Even if the required notification had been submitted, we know of no evidence that would establish that your product is not adulterated. In the absence of a history of use or other evidence of safety establishing that DMBA, when used under the conditions recommended or suggested in the labeling of your product, will reasonably be expected to be safe, tru Weight & EnergyTM is adulterated under sections 402(f)(1)(B) and 413(a) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 342(f)(1)(B) and 350b(a)) because it contains a new dietary ingredient for which there is inadequate information to provide reasonable assurance that such ingredient does not present a significant or unreasonable risk of illness or injury. Introduction of such a product into interstate commerce is prohibited under sections 301(a) and (v) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 331(a) and (v)). To the best of FDA’s knowledge, there is no history of use or other evidence of safety establishing that DMBA will reasonably be expected to be safe when used as a dietary ingredient. 
It has come to our attention that DMBA used in products in the dietary supplement marketplace may be produced synthetically. Section 201(ff)(1) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 321(ff)(1)) defines “dietary ingredient” as a vitamin, mineral, amino acid, herb or other botanical, or dietary substance for use by man to supplement the diet by increasing the total dietary intake, or a concentrate, metabolite, constituent, extract or combination of any dietary ingredient from the preceding categories. Synthetically produced DMBA is not a vitamin, mineral, amino acid, herb or other botanical. To the best of FDA’s knowledge, synthetically produced DMBA is not commonly used as human food or drink. Further, synthetically produced DMBA is not a concentrate, metabolite, constituent, extract or combination of the preceding categories. Therefore, synthetically produced DMBA is not a dietary ingredient as defined in section 201(ff)(1) of the Act.
Bitter Orange Extract (synephrine 30%)
Bitter orange (C. aurantium) is a dietary ingredient under sections 201(ff)(1)(C) and 201(ff)(1)(E) of the Act and has a history of use by man intended to supplement the diet. However, the levels of synephrine in Bitter Orange Extract (synephrine 30%) have been modified from naturally occurring levels. The natural p-synephrine content in dried bitter orange ranges from 0.012%-0.25%[1] and the content of p-synephrine in concentrated extracts or commercial products are standardized to 4-6%[2],[3],[4]
To the best of FDA’s knowledge, there is no information demonstrating that Bitter Orange Extract (synephrine 30%) was lawfully marketed as a dietary ingredient in the United States before October 15, 1994, nor is there information demonstrating that this ingredient has been present in the food supply as an article used for human food in a form in which the food has not been chemically altered. In the absence of such information, Bitter Orange Extract (synephrine 30%) is subject to the notification requirement in section 413(a)(2) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 350b(a)(2)) and 21 CFR 190.6. Because the required notification has not been submitted, your product is adulterated under sections 402(f)(1)(B) and 413(a) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 342(f)(1)(B) and 350b(a)).
Even if the required notification had been submitted, we know of no evidence that would establish that your product is not adulterated. In the absence of a history of use or other evidence of safety establishing that Bitter Orange Extract (synephrine 30%), when used under the conditions recommended or suggested in the labeling of your product, will reasonably be expected to be safe, your tru Weight & EnergyTM is adulterated under sections 402(f)(1)(B) and 413(a) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 342(f)(1)(B) and 350b(a)) because it contains a new dietary ingredient for which there is inadequate information to provide reasonable assurance that such ingredient does not present a significant or unreasonable risk of illness or injury. To the best of FDA’s knowledge, there is no history of use or other evidence of safety establishing that Bitter Orange Extract (synephrine 30%) will reasonably be expected to be safe when used as a dietary ingredient. In fact, there is evidence from short term human and animal studies suggesting that the consumption of products containing a high dosage of bitter orange extract and synephrine could lead to a significant increase in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate.  Similarly, products containing Bitter Orange Extract with high doses of p-synephrine and caffeine, also an ingredient in your product may be of potential safety concern. The combination of these substances is likely to enhance their potential cardiovascular effects and could contribute to a significant increase in heart rate and blood pressure[5].
We request that you take prompt action to correct the violations cited above, as well as any other violations associated with your tru Weight & EnergyTM product or other dietary supplement products marketed by your firm, including any that contain DMBA and/or Bitter Orange Extract (synephrine 30%). We also remind you that the new dietary ingredient notification requirement applies to all dietary supplements that contain new dietary ingredients that have not been present in the food supply as articles used for food in a form in which the food has not been chemically altered. It is your responsibility to ensure that your firm complies with all requirements of federal law and FDA regulations.
Failure to immediately cease distribution of your tru Weight & EnergyTM product and any other products you market that contain DMBA and/or Bitter Orange Extract (synephrine 30%) could result in enforcement action by FDA without further notice. Sections 302 and 304 of the Act provide for seizure of violative products and injunction against the manufacturers and distributors of violative products [21 U.S.C. §§ 332 and 334]. 
We request that you advise us in writing, within 15 days of receipt of this letter, as to the specific steps that have been or will be taken to correct these violations, including any steps taken with respect to product currently in the marketplace. Your response should also include an explanation of each step taken to ensure that similar violations do not recur, as well as documentation to support your response. Your written reply should be directed to Mr. Rob Genzel, Compliance Officer, United States Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, 5100 Paint Branch Parkway, Office of Compliance (HFS-608), Division of Enforcement, College Park, Maryland 20740-3835. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Genzel atrob.genzel@fda.hhs.gov.
Sincerely,
/S/                                                                                               
William A. Correll
Director
Office of Compliance
Center for Food Safety
  and Applied Nutrition


[1] Rossato, L. G.; Costa, V. M.; Limberger, R. P.; Bastos, M. d. L.; RemiĆ£o, F., Synephrine: From trace concentrations to massive consumption in weight-loss. Food and Chemical Toxicology 2011, 49, (1), 8-16.
[2] Kubo, K.; Kiyose, C.; Ogino, S.; Saito, M., Suppressive Effect of <i>Citrus aurantium</i> against Body Fat Accumulation and Its Safety. Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition 2005, 36, (1), 11-17.
[3] Nguyen, D. T.; Bui, L. T.; Ambrose, P. J., Response of CEDIA amphetamines assay after a single dose of bitter orange. Ther Drug Monit 2006, 28, (2), 252-4.
[4] Penzak, S. R.; Jann, M. W.; Cold, J. A.; Hon, Y. Y.; Desai, H. D.; Gurley, B. J., Seville (sour) Orange Juice: Synephrine Content and Cardiovascular Effects in Normotensive Adults. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology2001, 41, (10), 1059-1063.
[5] Health assessment of sports and weight loss products containing synephrine and caffeine. www.bfr.bund.de

Diabetes and Weight Loss

Diabetes and Weight Loss


A new injectable drug, aimed at helping obese and seriously overweight people who have other weight-related health conditions, has proven effective in a new round of testing by the FDA.

It's actually been around for a couple of years to treat diabetes but was just approved by the FDA for weight loss in December. 

There was a study aimed to make sure that it was effective for weight loss.

The latest study involved 3,700 people from six continents and showed similar results to those in the previous trial: 

  • improved weight loss and 
  • control of blood sugar
  • many other known side effects
The findings are published in New England Journal of Medicine.
.
That my friends is a real study, showing real results.. not this... this is not a study!

Is Saxenda safe for weight loss?

What will this do to sales of other weight loss products, such as plexus products?

How about this FDA approved device ?

The Maestro Rechargeable System 

The Maestro Rechargeable System is a weight-loss treatment for patients who are morbidly obese or who are obese with one or more obesity-related conditions. 



FDA warns Plexus Worldwide


This is what Plexus people think of the FDA warning letter below: 



Anna Maldonado says " We are on a first name basis with the FDA""

I guess she thinks its a good thing.. ??


Diamond Ambassador says; 



Here is the FDA Warning Letter: 

Plexus Worldwide Inc 7/30/14

Department of Health and Human Services

Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration
Los Angeles District
Pacific Region
19701 Fairchild
Irvine, CA 92612
Telephone:      949-608-2900
FAX:    949-608-4415

WARNING LETTER
VIA UNITED PARCEL SERVICE                                                                     
SIGNATURE REQUIRED
July 30, 2014                                                                                                     
WL # 28-14
Tarl Robinson, Chief Executive Officer
Plexus Worldwide, Inc.
15649 N. Greenway Hayden Loop
Scottsdale, AZ 91356
Dear Mr. Robinson:
This is to advise you that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviewed your website at the Internet address www.plexusworldwide.com in April and July 2014 and has determined that you take orders there for the products Fast Relief, ProBio5 and BioCleanse, which the website promotes for conditions that cause these products to be drugs under section 201(g)(1)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (the Act) [21 U.S.C. § 321(g)(1)(B)]. The therapeutic claims on your website establish that your products are drugs because they are intended for use in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease. As explained further below, introducing or delivering these products for introduction into interstate commerce for such uses violates the Act. You may find the Act and FDA regulations through links on FDA’s home page at www.fda.gov.
Examples of some of the website claims that provide evidence that your products are intended for use as drugs include: 
Fast Relief
  • “Nerve damage is present to some degree in most cases of chronic pain, especially neck and back pain. Nerve damage can occur due to trauma, medication side effects, or other metabolic issues.” 
  • “Features & Benefits…[m]ay reduce the associated symptoms from nerve damage of pain, numbness, tingling, ‘pins and needles’ sensations, and weakness.”
ProBio5
  • ProBio5 will typically provide the following results…jock itch, migraine headaches, recurring cystitis/vaginal infections…”
Bio Cleanse
  • “Why do you need Plexus Bio-Cleanse? Many people are in a low oxygen/toxic state….[v]iruses, bacteria, fungi, and other pathogenic microbes thrive in this condition, and can lead to disease such as flu, Candida, chronic fatigue, etc.   Plexus Bio-Cleanse can increase the oxygen levels around these microbes, causing them to die due to their high-oxygenated environment.”
Your Fast Relief, ProBio5 and BioCleanse are not generally recognized as safe and effective for the above referenced uses and, therefore, the products are “new drugs” under section 201(p) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 321(p)]. New drugs may not be legally introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce without prior approval from FDA, as described in section 505(a) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 355(a)]; see also section 301(d) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 331(d)]. The FDA approves a new drug on the basis of scientific data submitted by a drug sponsor to demonstrate that the drug is safe and effective.
Furthermore, your Fast Relief, ProBio5 and BioCleanse are offered for conditions that are not amenable to self-diagnosis and treatment by individuals who are not medical practitioners; therefore, adequate directions for use cannot be written so that a layperson can use these drugs safely for their intended purposes. Thus, these drugs are misbranded under section 502(f)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 352(f)(1)] in that their labeling fails to bear adequate directions for use. The introduction of a misbranded drug into interstate commerce is a violation of section 301(a) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 331(a)].
The violations cited in this letter are not intended to be an all-inclusive list of violations that exist in connection with your products. You are responsible for investigating and determining the causes of the violations identified above and for preventing their recurrence or the occurrence of other violations. It is your responsibility to ensure that all products marketed by your firm comply with all requirements of federal law and FDA regulations.
You should take prompt action to correct the violations cited in this letter. Failure to promptly correct these violations may result in legal action without further notice, including, without limitation, seizure and injunction. 
Within fifteen (15) working days of receipt of this letter, please notify this office in writing of the specific steps that you have taken to correct violations. Include an explanation of each step being taken to prevent the recurrence of violations, as well as copies of related documentation. If you cannot complete corrective action within fifteen working days, state the reason for the delay and the time within which you will complete the correction. 
Please submit your response to:
Nancy Schmidt, Acting Director
Compliance Branch
Food and Drug Administration
Los Angeles District
19701 Fairchild
Irvine, CA 92612
Include Special Identifier FEI #3010151057 on all correspondence. If you have any questions please contact Dr. Raymond W. Brullo at (949) 608-2918.
Sincerely,
/S/
Alonza E. Cruse, Director
Los Angeles District
Cc: 
Harlan Loui, Acting Chief
California Department of Public Health
Food and Drug Branch
1500 Capitol Avenue, MS-7602
P.O. Box 997435
Sacramento, CA 95899-7435


What does the company do?


If the company actually used tested products, or used products that were tested, they could have done this:

 "The FDA approves a new drug on the basis of scientific data submitted by a drug sponsor to demonstrate that the drug is safe and effective."

..


Black Friday &amp; Cyber Monday Exclusive Coupon, Sitewide Up to $50 Cashback, Free Shipping, $50 Off $449, Code:BLKFRI50

Comments