Court Documents

Court Documents 

"Defendant Robinson's goal was to get full control of the company"

Here for you to view.

Not sure where they came from or who screwed who.

""22. Defendant Robinson knew that his treatment of Plaintiff at the || company's yearly convention would embarrass, humiliate and demean Plaintiff, and, in order to assure that that occurred, Robinson told many PLEXUS personnel and ambassadors that he had to send Plaintiff home due to Plaintiff's misconduct with Brittany Gaines and also due to Plaintiff being drunk. Defendant Robinson's ||"story" was communicated by Robinson to all the PLEXUS staff and, in a matter of
hours, all the PLEXUS Ambassadors (distributors).
23. As a result of Defendant Robinson's conduct and statements at the
convention in Dallas, Plaintiff sent an e-mail to Defendant Robinson, on the following Monday, saying that Plaintiff was taking a six-month sabbatical from the company. About 10 days later, Defendant Robinson had a meeting with Plaintiff, and said to Plaintiff: "Here are the terms of your sabbatical." I was thinking, you arrogant SOB. It is MY sabbatical not yours.""

Have a nice read. Here is the link: 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1eMimsWHkpG1mJ9uMQSZBxGyKM2wroA40uDfZbyQ4QDo/edit?usp=sharing

Health Fraud

Plexus Worldwide, the company known for a Pink Drink, has been accused of Health Fraud, violations of the FTC and the FDA,  just to name a few.

Truth in Advertising posted their independent investigation here.

I want to thank them for their hard work.

For the sceptics, naysayers and those that were just down right dirty over the years... well.. you know.

Plexus Scam

Plexus Scam

Is this company another MLM Scam?

There have been many visitors asking the same question and looking here for an answer.

I have a question for those that visit this site.

Why is this blog frequently monitored by the following companies, if Plexus is not a scam?

1. Plexus and their numerous 'plexus police' pimps
2. Sonya Dudley, Helen McFadden, Sheila Medina and other top dollar money making #IamPlexus Plexus Ambassadors and their perspective lawyers.
3. United States Government agencies - including and not limited to:
1. US Department of Defence
2. The FDA
3. The FTC
4. The IRS
5. The Department of Homeland Security
6. United States Senate
4. Past and Present people involved with TruVision Health
5. Government Agencies within Canada and Australia

As it states on the blog.. there is a tracker.. there are a few actually .. I like to see who you are. 

Thank you for visiting and please connect with me if you have questions.

Remember: Plexus Worldwide is still under investigation by many government agencies and Tarl Robinson will settle out of court should one decide to pursue that route.

Plexus Lawsuit

Plexus Lawsuit to be one of the biggest in MLM history. 

Inside court documents reveal Alfred Pettersen "alleges fraud, fraudulent transfer, breach of fiduciary duty and violation of the
2012 shareholders’ agreement". 

?? 2012 





We already knew that this company was build on a foundation of lies, deceit and fraud! 

Sealed Document

Sealed Documents Case Information Case Number: CV2015-051936 Judge: Anderson, Aimee File Date: 5/15/2015 Location: Northeast Case Type: Civil   Party Information Party Name Relationship Sex Attorney Alfred Pettersen   Plaintiff  Male  Philip Nathanson  Tarl Robinson   Defendant  Male  Joshua Ernst  Plexus Holdco L L P   Defendant    Joshua Ernst  Plexus Holdings Inc   Defendant    Joshua Ernst  Plexus Worldwide L L P   Defendant    Joshua Ernst  Plexus Worldwide L L C   Defendant    Joshua Ernst  Plexus Worldwide Inc   Defendant    Joshua Ernst  Case Documents Filing Date Description Docket Date Filing Party 2/5/2016  MTC - Motion To Compel  2/5/2016    NOTE: Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration  2/5/2016  MTT - Motion To Transfer  2/5/2016    NOTE: Motion to Transfer to Commercial Court  2/5/2016  CAN - Credit Memo Appearance Fee Paid  2/5/2016    NOTE: Credit Memo/Appearance Fee Paid  1/29/2016  ORD - Order  1/29/2016    NOTE: ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT.  1/29/2016  SDD - Notice: Sealed Document  2/1/2016    NOTE: PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT  1/7/2016  ORD - Order  1/7/2016    NOTE: ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO SEAL PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND THE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SAME.  1/7/2016  ORD - Order  1/8/2016    NOTE: ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO SEAL COURT RECORDS  1/4/2016  SDD - Notice: Sealed Document  1/5/2016    NOTE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SEAL PLAINTIFF'S PROPOSED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND THE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SAME  12/31/2015  SDD - Notice: Sealed Document  1/4/2016    NOTE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE HIS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. PLAINTIFF ASKS FOR ACCELERATED CONSIDERATION OF THIS MOTION.  12/28/2015  MOT - Motion  12/29/2015    NOTE: TO SEAL COURT RECORDS  10/21/2015  311 - ME: 150 Day Minute Entry  10/21/2015    9/8/2015  WSS - Waiver Of Service Of Summons  9/8/2015    NOTE: Waiver of Service of Summons ALL DEFENDANTS  8/19/2015  322 - ME: Notice Of Intent To Dismiss  8/19/2015    5/15/2015  COM - Complaint  5/19/2015    5/15/2015  CCN - Cert Arbitration - Not Subject  5/19/2015    5/15/2015  CSH - Coversheet  5/19/2015

Alfred Pettersen V. Tarl Robinson

hahaha.. I love it!

Makes you wonder what really went on and when those that worship Plexus will see the light!

Plexus Worldwide is listed here as having 5 different companies. Money Laundering do you suspect?

Alfred Pettersen went on his so called "I got married and want to spend time with my new wife" Who was a Plexus employee. He hasn't been back to the company since. Alfred and Anna have recently filed for divorce. Makes you wonder if he married her to stay in the country?

We know that Alfred has teamed up with Dennis Harris. Did that not work out?

Tarl Robinson, well Shirley's son must benefit from her late husbands fortune,


The above photo clip is found here.

I guess this explains Alfred's absence from the Pima ground breaking ceremony. Even Tarl's mama, Shirley Pontious, showed up!

Sheila, Patti, Shirley, Deborah, Tarl  NO Alfred anywhere that day!

Update to the court document found at the top of this page.

On 8/19/2015 a Notice Of Intent To Dismiss was filed in the Maricopa Court system.

Click to view that civil court case

It seems as though the 120 day rule has applied here. For some absurb reason Alfred Pettersen and/or his legal team did not follow through with serving the documents to Tarl Robinson and Plexus Holdings (Plexus Worldwide).

I highly doubt this was an oversight. Initiating this legal procedure in court could have been a 'warning' to Tarl from Alfred, Alfred is great at giving 'warnings'; or this could have been something that was initiated and settled out of court.

Will we know what happened after the pink drink spilt?


What we do know is that Alfred and Plexus have parted ways, just like Alfred and his lovely wife, Anna. Contact Anna's lawyer to see if he will give you the details of their divorce settlement. Wonder if Alfred is moving back here to Canada?

FDA warns Plexus Worldwide

This is what Plexus people think of the FDA warning letter below: 

Anna Maldonado says " We are on a first name basis with the FDA""

I guess she thinks its a good thing.. ??

Diamond Ambassador says; 

Here is the FDA Warning Letter: 

Plexus Worldwide Inc 7/30/14

Department of Health and Human Services	Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration
	Los Angeles District Pacific Region 19701 Fairchild Irvine, CA 92612 Telephone:      949-608-2900 FAX:    949-608-4415

WARNING LETTER

VIA UNITED PARCEL SERVICE                                                                     

SIGNATURE REQUIRED

July 30, 2014                                                                                                     

WL # 28-14

Tarl Robinson, Chief Executive Officer

Plexus Worldwide, Inc.

15649 N. Greenway Hayden Loop

Scottsdale, AZ 91356

Dear Mr. Robinson:

This is to advise you that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviewed your website at the Internet address www.plexusworldwide.com in April and July 2014 and has determined that you take orders there for the products Fast Relief, ProBio5 and BioCleanse, which the website promotes for conditions that cause these products to be drugs under section 201(g)(1)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (the Act) [21 U.S.C. § 321(g)(1)(B)]. The therapeutic claims on your website establish that your products are drugs because they are intended for use in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease. As explained further below, introducing or delivering these products for introduction into interstate commerce for such uses violates the Act. You may find the Act and FDA regulations through links on FDA’s home page at www.fda.gov.

Examples of some of the website claims that provide evidence that your products are intended for use as drugs include: 

Fast Relief

• “Nerve damage is present to some degree in most cases of chronic pain, especially neck and back pain. Nerve damage can occur due to trauma, medication side effects, or other metabolic issues.” 
• “Features & Benefits…[m]ay reduce the associated symptoms from nerve damage of pain, numbness, tingling, ‘pins and needles’ sensations, and weakness.”

ProBio5

• ProBio5 will typically provide the following results…jock itch, migraine headaches, recurring cystitis/vaginal infections…”

Bio Cleanse

• “Why do you need Plexus Bio-Cleanse? Many people are in a low oxygen/toxic state….[v]iruses, bacteria, fungi, and other pathogenic microbes thrive in this condition, and can lead to disease such as flu, Candida, chronic fatigue, etc.   Plexus Bio-Cleanse can increase the oxygen levels around these microbes, causing them to die due to their high-oxygenated environment.”

Your Fast Relief, ProBio5 and BioCleanse are not generally recognized as safe and effective for the above referenced uses and, therefore, the products are “new drugs” under section 201(p) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 321(p)]. New drugs may not be legally introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce without prior approval from FDA, as described in section 505(a) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 355(a)]; see also section 301(d) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 331(d)]. The FDA approves a new drug on the basis of scientific data submitted by a drug sponsor to demonstrate that the drug is safe and effective.

Furthermore, your Fast Relief, ProBio5 and BioCleanse are offered for conditions that are not amenable to self-diagnosis and treatment by individuals who are not medical practitioners; therefore, adequate directions for use cannot be written so that a layperson can use these drugs safely for their intended purposes. Thus, these drugs are misbranded under section 502(f)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 352(f)(1)] in that their labeling fails to bear adequate directions for use. The introduction of a misbranded drug into interstate commerce is a violation of section 301(a) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 331(a)].

The violations cited in this letter are not intended to be an all-inclusive list of violations that exist in connection with your products. You are responsible for investigating and determining the causes of the violations identified above and for preventing their recurrence or the occurrence of other violations. It is your responsibility to ensure that all products marketed by your firm comply with all requirements of federal law and FDA regulations.

You should take prompt action to correct the violations cited in this letter. Failure to promptly correct these violations may result in legal action without further notice, including, without limitation, seizure and injunction. 

Within fifteen (15) working days of receipt of this letter, please notify this office in writing of the specific steps that you have taken to correct violations. Include an explanation of each step being taken to prevent the recurrence of violations, as well as copies of related documentation. If you cannot complete corrective action within fifteen working days, state the reason for the delay and the time within which you will complete the correction. 

Please submit your response to:

Nancy Schmidt, Acting Director

Compliance Branch

Food and Drug Administration

Los Angeles District

19701 Fairchild

Irvine, CA 92612

Include Special Identifier FEI #3010151057 on all correspondence. If you have any questions please contact Dr. Raymond W. Brullo at (949) 608-2918.

Sincerely,

/S/

Alonza E. Cruse, Director

Los Angeles District

Cc: 

Harlan Loui, Acting Chief

California Department of Public Health

Food and Drug Branch

1500 Capitol Avenue, MS-7602

P.O. Box 997435

Sacramento, CA 95899-7435

What does the company do?

If the company actually used tested products, or used products that were tested, they could have done this:

 "The FDA approves a new drug on the basis of scientific data submitted by a drug sponsor to demonstrate that the drug is safe and effective."

..